FEATURED

Emerging Markets Are Waking Up

Here is something that does not get said plainly enough: the biggest capital rotation of 2026 is already happening, and most U.S. investors have barely moved.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index returned 34.36% in full-year 2025, compared with roughly 17% for the S&P 500 and 21% for the MSCI World index. That was EM’s best year relative to developed markets since 2017. And 2026 has picked up where 2025 left off: the index is up nearly 28% year-to-date as of late June. Yet despite that run, aggregate positioning data from State Street Global Markets confirms that global investors are still underweight EM. Most didn’t participate last year. Many still aren’t participating now.

That gap between performance and positioning is the whole story.

Why This Time Feels Different

What began as a tactical rebound has developed legs. Valuations were discounted heading into this cycle. The dollar weakened sharply through most of 2025. Investors were looking for something outside a increasingly concentrated U.S. market. All three of those conditions lined up at once, which is rare.

Slight tangent, but it matters: the 2025 dollar story was extreme. The DXY dropped roughly 11% in the first half of last year, its steepest first-half decline since 1973, driven by tariff uncertainty and recession fears. The index bottomed near 96.5 in September before stabilizing. That dollar weakness was the single biggest mechanical tailwind for EM returns last year. A softer dollar lifts local currency asset prices in dollar terms and eases financial conditions across the board for anyone carrying dollar-denominated debt.

Here is the math argument: U.S. equities now account for roughly two-thirds of global equity benchmarks. When allocations are that skewed, even modest adjustments carry weight. A one-percentage-point reallocation away from U.S. equities can translate into a meaningfully disproportionate inflow into EM simply because the asset class is smaller. Public pension plans, for instance, currently target around 5% in EM allocations on average, well below EM’s roughly 11% weight in the MSCI ACWI. The gap between where institutions are and where benchmarks say they should be is unusually wide.

What the Flow Data Actually Shows

In 2025, emerging markets attracted just $21.5 billion in net inflows despite a 34% return, leaving EM at only 5.2% of global equity fund assets under management against an 11%-plus benchmark weight. That underallocation was confirmed again in early 2026. State Street’s institutional investor data through February showed real-money investors still underweight in EM equities. Emerging market bonds and FX saw some risk-adding flows, but equity positioning remained light.

The bifurcation within EM is where it gets interesting. Not all markets are equally positioned. Taiwan and Korea sit at the center of the global semiconductor supply chain, and the current AI hardware buildout runs directly through them. Consensus earnings growth expectations for EM in 2026 sit around 21%, substantially above the 15% forecast for the U.S. and 13% for broader developed markets. TSMC trades at roughly 18x forward earnings and SK Hynix at under 7x, compared with Nvidia at over 23x, despite similar growth and profitability profiles. The valuation arbitrage is real and institutional.

Then there is Latin America. The region is relatively insulated from U.S. trade policy, carries some of the lowest effective U.S. tariff rates, and generates a greater share of revenues outside the United States compared to Asian EM peers. A weaker dollar eases LatAm debt burdens, creates room for fiscal policy support, and strengthens local currencies, which in turn curtails imported inflation. Brazilian and Mexican equities specifically tend to be early beneficiaries when the DXY softens materially.

The Risk the Bulls Are Underweighting

Here is where the current moment gets complicated.

At its June 17 meeting, the Fed held rates unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75% for the fourth consecutive meeting. That was expected. What was not fully priced in: nine of 18 FOMC participants now project at least one rate hike before year-end, the median dot shifted up to 3.8%, and the statement dropped its prior easing bias entirely. Headline PCE inflation is running at 3.6% on the Fed’s own projections. Chair Kevin Warsh, in his first FOMC press conference, did not push back on the hike scenario. The DXY broke back above 100 in June, its highest level since May 2025, on the back of that hawkish signal.

That is the key tension. The entire EM investment thesis rests on a combination of dollar softness, risk appetite holding, and EM earnings delivering. A Fed that actually hikes reverses the dollar story quickly. Research has consistently found that rising U.S. yields are most damaging to EM asset prices when they reflect a rise in the U.S. term premium alongside dollar appreciation. A 100 basis point increase in the U.S. term premium has historically been associated with roughly a 10% depreciation in EM currencies. That is not a small number.

BofA shifted its forecast this week to three quarter-point hikes in 2026, which would take the benchmark rate to 4.25% to 4.50%. Goldman’s base case still has the Fed avoiding hikes, but they acknowledge the path is narrow. The incoming inflation data between now and the July 29 meeting will be decisive.

The asymmetry still exists. EM equities have shown notable resilience through geopolitical shocks this year, including the March-April Iran-related turbulence, without the broad derating that historically accompanied similar events. EM sovereign balance sheets are in better shape than prior cycles. The structural case rests on capital rotating away from historically concentrated U.S. allocations, earnings growth that outpaces developed markets, and valuations that remain significantly discounted. But this is not something you can ignore and revisit in six months. The dollar is the dial. Watch it constantly.

Where the Opportunity Actually Lives

EEM and VWO capture broad EM exposure, but they are not interchangeable. EEM is up roughly 53% over the trailing year and 15.85% year-to-date. VWO is up about 37% over the same trailing period but holds zero Korean exposure because FTSE classifies Korea as a developed market. That 19-point spread between the two funds is almost entirely explained by semiconductor exposure. If you believe the AI hardware cycle still has room, EEM’s Korea weighting matters a lot.

For more targeted exposure: the Korea-Taiwan semiconductor angle via individual names gives direct AI infrastructure exposure without U.S. valuation multiples. Latin American financials and commodity names carry the most leverage to a dollar-down cycle. EM aggregate GDP is expected to grow around 4% in 2026, roughly double the pace of advanced economies, with three-quarters of that growth driven by domestic demand rather than exports.

For options traders, defined-risk long structures on EEM with six-to-nine month duration capture the thesis while managing dollar reversal risk. The June Fed shock pushed implied volatility modestly higher across EM ETFs, but IV rank remains far from elevated historical levels, which means long premium in this space is still relatively affordable compared to prior EM vol regimes.

The rotation started in 2025. It extended into 2026. Most institutional portfolios are still catching up. That gap is where the remaining opportunity sits, as long as the Fed does not become the story that ends it.