TXN Options Are Screaming

The Signal

Something unusual is happening in the Texas Instruments options market. And it started well before today.

Over the past several sessions, implied volatility on TXN’s July 24th weekly options has been running at levels that belong in a different stock entirely. As of July 21, the July 24th weekly call IV clocked in at 128, with August at 88. For context, TXN’s 52-week IV range sits between 24 and 71. What that means is that the market is currently pricing volatility nearly double the top of what it has seen over the prior year, and it is doing so in the shortest-dated contracts available. That is not hedging noise. That is a market that believes something meaningful is about to happen.

Pre-earnings options volume in TXN came in at roughly 3.3 times normal, with calls leading puts at approximately 10-to-9. The July 24th weekly straddle has been consistently priced for a move of around 12%, implying a roughly $34 swing in either direction from recent levels. The median post-earnings move for TXN over the past eight quarters is 6.1%. The options market is pricing in a move twice that size.

That gap between historical behavior and current pricing is the story worth examining.

Why It Matters

This is not a speculative momentum name. Texas Instruments is a 90-year-old semiconductor manufacturer with a $265 billion market cap, a business model built on analog chips and embedded processors, and a customer base spread across industrial, automotive, data center, and consumer end markets. It does not typically generate the kind of options frenzy you see in high-flying AI plays.

Which is exactly why the current IV environment demands attention.

When a deeply established, relatively low-volatility chip franchise suddenly sees its near-term options priced at more than 180% above the top of its annual IV range, it tells you that sophisticated participants are not treating this like a routine quarterly check-in. They are treating it like an inflection event. Whether that inflection is bullish, bearish, or simply uncertain depends on what gets said tonight. But the level of premium being paid to own optionality right now suggests conviction that the outcome will not be ordinary.

There is another layer here. The wide dispersion in analyst EPS estimates heading into the quarter, ranging from $1.66 to $2.04 across 26 analysts, is unusually broad for a company of this size and vintage. That dispersion itself reflects genuine disagreement about demand trajectory, not just modeling differences. The options market is essentially agreeing with that uncertainty by pricing for an outsized move in either direction.

The Company Behind the Signal

Texas Instruments reports Q2 2026 results after the close today, July 22. The consensus from 26 Wall Street analysts is non-GAAP EPS of approximately $1.92 to $1.95 on revenue of $5.24 billion. That revenue number, if achieved, would represent growth of roughly 17.5% to 17.8% year over year.

Let’s talk about why expectations are this high.

Q1 2026 was a breakout quarter. TXN reported GAAP EPS of $1.68, beating estimates by $0.32, a 23% positive surprise. Revenue of $4.83 billion came in $300 million above consensus and grew 18.7% year over year. What drove it was not one segment having a good quarter. It was broad-based acceleration. Analog revenue hit $3.9 billion, up 22% year over year. Embedded Processing rose 12%. Industrial revenues grew more than 30% compared to the prior year, and data center revenue surged roughly 90% year over year. That Q1 report triggered a nearly 19.5% single-day gain in the stock.

The stock has since pulled back from its all-time high of $334.03 reached in late June, and is currently trading near $291. It is still up approximately 69% year to date.

Management’s own Q2 guidance set the bar at $5.00 billion to $5.40 billion in revenue and EPS of $1.77 to $2.05. The current consensus sits near the upper end of that guided earnings range. That is a subtle but important detail: Wall Street is not just expecting TXN to meet guidance, it is expecting the company to run toward the ceiling of it.

Free cash flow tells a separate and compelling story. Trailing twelve-month FCF reached $4.4 billion at the end of Q1, up from $1.7 billion a year earlier. Capital expenditures declined to $676 million in Q1, down from $1.1 billion in the same period a year ago, as the heaviest phase of TXN’s six-year, $20-plus billion capacity buildout across its Sherman, Texas and Lehi, Utah fabs begins to wind down. CEO Haviv Ilan has projected $8 in free cash flow per share for full-year 2026. Q1 free cash flow alone jumped roughly 610% year over year as capex moderated. That math is starting to work.

On the analyst side, price targets have been moving in one direction. KeyBanc raised its target to $390 on July 14. TD Cowen bumped to $360. UBS raised to $350. Susquehanna lifted to $340. That is a cluster of major institutional upgrades in the weeks directly before earnings. Seventeen buy ratings currently outweigh two sell ratings.

And yet. Industrial demand, despite the sharp recovery, still sits roughly 15% below its 2022 peak. The company recently completed a $7.5 billion acquisition of Silicon Labs, which introduces integration complexity. The stock is trading at a trailing P/E ratio exceeding 49 times, well above its five-year historical median, which was closer to 25 times. Insider selling has run to approximately $88.9 million over the past three months. These are not reasons to dismiss the bull case, but they are reasons to take the bear case seriously.

Market Expectations vs. Reality

Here is where it gets interesting.

The options market is pricing approximately a 9% to 12% move for this earnings event, depending on the source. Bloomberg’s options data implies roughly a 9.1% move. The July 24th straddle has been pricing approximately 12%. The median actual post-earnings move over TXN’s past eight quarters is 6.1%. Options are implying a move roughly 50% to nearly 100% larger than the historical median.

But here is the context that makes that pricing less irrational than it first appears. Over the past eight quarters, TXN has actually exceeded the implied move in five of those eight instances. In April 2026, the stock moved 28.9% against an implied move of 6.3%. In January 2026, shares moved 12.8% against an implied of 5.8%. In July 2025, TXN fell 15.4% when the market was only pricing a 4.9% move. The market was repeatedly caught flat-footed.

Options traders appear to have adjusted for that history. They are no longer willing to price TXN like a stable, predictable large cap. The 52-week IV range of 24 to 71 already reflected a company going through a meaningful inflection. The current July weekly IV of 128 suggests the market believes this quarter carries at least as much weight as any in recent memory, possibly more.

The call-to-put ratio of approximately 1.1-to-1 is essentially neutral directionally. There is no strong skew toward calls or puts. That means the elevated volatility premium is not primarily a directional bet. It is a bet on magnitude. The market does not know which way this goes. It just believes it goes somewhere.

EPS consensus has been revised 22.3% higher over the past 90 days, climbing from $1.57 to $1.92. Revenue forecasts have seen 23 upward revisions over that same period. That kind of sustained upward revision cycle is the backdrop against which a miss, or even a soft guide, would land hard. The bar has been raised repeatedly. Tonight it either gets cleared, or it becomes the ceiling.

Strategic Considerations

The elevated IV environment shapes strategy in a specific way. When implied volatility sits at the top of a stock’s annual range, and far above historical realized volatility, buying outright calls or puts becomes expensive. You are paying for a large move, and if the stock delivers anything near its historical average reaction, you lose to time decay regardless of direction. That is the mathematical reality of purchasing premium when IV is at 128 on weeklies and the 52-week ceiling was 71.

That does not mean there is no opportunity here. It means the approach depends on your directional conviction and your tolerance for the volatility risk itself.

Three Frameworks Worth Considering

For traders who expect a large move and have directional conviction: A debit spread, either a bull call spread or a bear put spread, reduces the cost of entry by selling premium at a further strike. A bull call spread using July 24th expiration, buying a call near the current stock price and selling a call at a higher strike, captures the directional move while limiting the amount of IV you pay for on the long leg. The risk is defined to the premium paid. The challenge is that the spread itself has wider bid-ask behavior near earnings in high-IV environments, so execution quality matters. This structure makes sense if you believe the beat-and-raise pattern holds one more time and the stock responds with a move above the upper strike. It does not make sense if you believe the move will be modest.

For traders who believe IV is overpriced and expect a muted reaction: The classic earnings IV compression trade involves selling a straddle or strangle before the event and capturing premium decay post-earnings. Given IV is sitting near the top of TXN’s annual range, there is a reasonable argument that the market is overpricing uncertainty relative to historical outcomes. A defined-risk alternative would be an iron condor, selling both an out-of-the-money call spread and an out-of-the-money put spread, collecting premium while defining the maximum loss. This structure profits if TXN stays within a specific range after earnings. The risk is precisely that TXN has exceeded its implied move in five of the past eight quarters, which is exactly why this trade must use defined risk. If the stock moves 20%, an undefined short strangle can produce catastrophic losses. Keep wings tight, keep size modest.

For traders with no directional view who want exposure to the event: A calendar spread, buying a later-dated contract and selling the near-term expiration, takes advantage of the term structure dislocation. The July weekly IV at 128 versus August at 88 creates a steep front-end. Selling the July 24th expiration and buying an August contract collects the premium difference while maintaining longer-dated exposure. The risk is that if the stock moves sharply past the strike, the calendar loses value quickly. This is a structure for traders who believe the stock will not move as violently as priced, but who want to remain in the position post-earnings.

None of these should be entered without acknowledging the fundamental risk: TXN has demonstrated it is capable of moving 15% to 29% in either direction on a single earnings day. Any structure that does not define maximum loss ahead of time is inappropriate for this specific event.

Risk Analysis

The primary risk to the bull case is valuation compression. At a trailing P/E above 49 times and a forward multiple that still exceeds 35 times, TXN is priced for a sustained recovery that must deliver consistently. If management issues guidance below the upper end of current expectations, the reaction could be sharp, not because the business is broken, but because the stock price has already absorbed a great deal of optimism.

Industrial demand, while recovering, remains 15% below its 2022 peak. If Q2 results show any deceleration in the industrial recovery rate, particularly following a Q1 where industrial revenue grew more than 30% year over year, the comparison problem compounds through the back half of 2026.

The Silicon Labs acquisition adds a new variable. Integration costs, revenue timing, and any signal that the deal is more complex than anticipated could weigh on guidance tone even if the core business performs well.

On the bear side of the options trade, the primary risk is TXN repeating its April 2026 behavior when the stock moved 28.9%, far exceeding any reasonable short-premium structure. Short IV trades in front of this company’s earnings have been punished repeatedly when they underestimated the magnitude of the move.

Slight tangent worth noting: the broader semiconductor index has seen its own volatility this month, with sector-wide selling in several AI-adjacent names. That backdrop matters for TXN not because of direct exposure, but because any weakness in the semi complex amplifies selling pressure on a stock that has already run nearly 70% year to date.

What to Watch

Tonight’s earnings call is at 3:30 p.m. Central time. The headline EPS and revenue numbers matter, but they are not the whole story. In TXN’s case, they rarely are.

Watch for these specific signals:

• Analog revenue vs. the $4.12 billion analyst estimate. This is the single number that drives the most post-earnings movement. Polymarket traders assign an 80.5% probability it clears $4 billion. Whether it clears $4.12 billion is a different question.
• Q3 guidance range and midpoint. Management has a pattern of conservative guidance followed by beats. If Q3 guidance comes in below the current consensus range, the stock will likely react negatively regardless of Q2 results. This company’s guidance framing often moves the stock more than the actual results.
• Data center revenue commentary. The 90% year-over-year growth in Q1 was exceptional. Any sign of moderation, or any sign of acceleration, will set the tone for the second half.
• Gross margin direction. Gross margin has been tracking near 57% to 58% as factory utilization rises. Any step toward 60% would be a meaningful positive signal. Any compression would raise questions about whether the margin inflection thesis is playing out as expected.
• Free cash flow per share trajectory. CEO Haviv Ilan’s $8 FCF per share target for 2026 is the central pillar of the long-term investment case. Any commentary that puts that target at risk would likely outweigh a Q2 beat on its own.
• Management tone on industrial demand. With industrial still 15% below its 2022 peak, the key question is whether the recovery is accelerating into the second half or beginning to plateau at current levels.

The IV crush after this event will be substantial. Whatever the stock does tonight, August IV at 88 will collapse toward the mid-30s within days. The premium that exists in these options right now disappears quickly. The question is whether the underlying move is large enough, in the right direction, to offset that decay for anyone long options going into the close.

That is not a question the options market has answered. It has only told us how much uncertainty it is willing to pay for.

Tactical Checklist

• July 24th weekly IV: 128. August IV: 88. 52-week range: 24 to 71. Current IV is significantly above the annual ceiling.
• July 24th straddle has priced for approximately a 12% move; implied move from Bloomberg options data is approximately 9.1%.
• Historical median post-earnings move over the past eight quarters: 6.1%. TXN exceeded its implied move in 5 of those 8 instances.
• Q2 consensus: Non-GAAP EPS approximately $1.92 to $1.95; revenue $5.24 billion, representing roughly 17.5% to 17.8% year-over-year growth.
• Call-to-put ratio: approximately 1.1-to-1. No strong directional skew; the elevated premium reflects uncertainty on magnitude, not direction.
• Pre-earnings options volume running at 3.3 times normal.
• Defined-risk structures are appropriate given TXN’s history of outsized reactions in either direction.
• Directional buyers: Consider debit spreads to manage the cost of elevated IV rather than buying outright options.
• Neutral traders: An iron condor defines the maximum loss but requires strikes wide enough to account for the possibility of a 15% to 29% move.
• Watch Q3 guidance range above all else. Management tone on the call has historically driven the stock as much as the reported numbers.
• IV crush post-earnings will be rapid. August IV at 88 is likely to compress sharply regardless of the stock’s direction. Positions that are long premium must account for this decay.
• Insider selling of approximately $88.9 million over the past three months is a risk factor worth holding alongside the bull case.
• The stock has run nearly 69% year to date and is trading at a trailing P/E above 49 times. The margin for error on guidance is narrow.

The options market has spoken clearly today. Texas Instruments is priced for a significant move. History says it often delivers one. Whether the direction matches the implied magnitude is what earnings season is designed to answer.

The more useful question, and the one that defines good options analysis, is not where TXN will trade tomorrow morning. It is whether the market’s current pricing of uncertainty is reasonable given what we know. At IV of 128 on a stock that spent the past year between 24 and 71, the answer is that someone believes this quarter is genuinely different from the ones before it.

We will know by morning whether they were right.

Options Trading Report